Skip to main content
Illustration for Loud, Not Right: Validating a Smart Monitor's Cry-Classification Label Against What Actually Soothed the Baby

Loud, Not Right

Validating a Smart Monitor's Cry-Classification Label Against What Actually Soothed the Baby

A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities follows 68 families running a smart baby monitor's cry-classification feature across a 14-week deployment, matching the monitor's predicted cry category against the soothing action that actually settled the baby, logged blind to the on-device label. Label-match rate holds flat between 47% and 53% across the full deployment, while the monitor's own confidence score tracks the cry's acoustic loudness far more closely than whether the label was correct.

AuthorsRuna Adegoke, Ronja Oyelaran
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.mjo541
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_mjo541,
  author       = {Runa Adegoke and Ronja Oyelaran},
  title        = {Loud, Not Right: Validating a Smart Monitor's Cry-Classification Label Against What Actually Soothed the Baby},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.mjo541},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-validating-whether-a-mjo541/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}