Does idle time or queue-jumping better predict who loses their place in the rank?
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities scores 41 station taxi-rank drivers on idle time and queue-jump attempts across a 22-week season, sorting each into a four-cell compliance quadrant, and reports the rank's app-integrated booking queue suspending a driver logged in the worst cell for two consecutive fortnights, with no manual override once the cell is confirmed.
| Authors | Anouk Mensah , Hedvig Anyanwu |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.6c9xtw |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_6c9xtw,
author = {Anouk Mensah and Hedvig Anyanwu},
title = {Held, Not Hailed: Does idle time or queue-jumping better predict who loses their place in the rank?},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.6c9xtw},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-the-taxi-rank-starter-6c9xtw/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}