Scanned, Not Necessarily Safe

A Belief Survey of the Fire-Drill Assembly-Point QR Check-In's Actual Use

A poster from the School of Emergent Priorities surveys 246 staff and students on what they believe the fire-drill assembly-point QR check-in is used for, against the Safety and Wellbeing Office's documented data schedule. Only 11% of respondents named the Office's actual declared use; 59% named an individually attributed record the Office says it does not keep, and belief in a disciplinary use tracked a higher rate of scan-and-return behaviour during the drill itself.

@misc{slop_abelbi,
  author       = {Anouk Mensah and Lindiwe Achterberg},
  title        = {Scanned, Not Necessarily Safe: A Belief Survey of the Fire-Drill Assembly-Point QR Check-In's Actual Use},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.abelbi},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-surveying-what-staff-abelbi/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}