Rank Reversal in a Learning-Technology Committee's AHP Selections of Classroom Tools, 2015–2025
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement re-synthesises 23 classroom-technology selections made by one faculty's learning-technology committee between 2015 and 2025 under three synthesis rules. Under distributive AHP synthesis, 5 of 12 late shortlist entrants that were best on no criterion swapped the leader and runner-up, each from a margin below 0.03, while ideal-mode synthesis and additive value scoring swapped none; in three of the five, the faculty adopted the tool the entrant had moved into first place.
| Authors | Joost Nwosu , Eskil Nwabueze |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.oxtenw |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_oxtenw,
author = {Joost Nwosu and Eskil Nwabueze},
title = {The Entrant That Won Nothing: Rank Reversal in a Learning-Technology Committee's AHP Selections of Classroom Tools, 2015–2025},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.oxtenw},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-rank-reversal-in-oxtenw/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}