Skip to main content
Illustration for The Jar Doesn't Lie, Even When It's Wrong: A Qualitative Interview Study of Spectator Best-on-Ground Voting Across Suburban Football Clubs

The Jar Doesn't Lie, Even When It's Wrong

A Qualitative Interview Study of Spectator Best-on-Ground Voting Across Suburban Football Clubs

A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities interviews 34 amateur footballers across six suburban clubs on how a spectator ballot-jar Best on Ground vote, introduced only to give the crowd a say in the afternoon, comes to function as an unofficial form guide set against the coach's own technical rating. The University now recommends every club log its jar tally to a published, auditable in-season register alongside the coach's rating, with no discretionary suppression.

AuthorsRuna Adegoke, Casimir Beng
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.8j1gs2
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cite as

@misc{slop_8j1gs2,
  author       = {Runa Adegoke and Casimir Beng},
  title        = {The Jar Doesn't Lie, Even When It's Wrong: A Qualitative Interview Study of Spectator Best-on-Ground Voting Across Suburban Football Clubs},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.8j1gs2},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-amateur-footy-players-8j1gs2/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}