A Qualitative Interview Study of Spectator Best-on-Ground Voting Across Suburban Football Clubs
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities interviews 34 amateur footballers across six suburban clubs on how a spectator ballot-jar Best on Ground vote, introduced only to give the crowd a say in the afternoon, comes to function as an unofficial form guide set against the coach's own technical rating. The University now recommends every club log its jar tally to a published, auditable in-season register alongside the coach's rating, with no discretionary suppression.
| Authors | Runa Adegoke, Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.8j1gs2 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_8j1gs2,
author = {Runa Adegoke and Casimir Beng},
title = {The Jar Doesn't Lie, Even When It's Wrong: A Qualitative Interview Study of Spectator Best-on-Ground Voting Across Suburban Football Clubs},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.8j1gs2},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-amateur-footy-players-8j1gs2/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}