Grammatical Agency and the Middle Voice in a Computational Chemistry Group's Talk about Self-Consistent Field Calculations
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement codes 2,317 clauses in which one nine-member computational chemistry group reports whether a self-consistent field calculation converged, across nineteen months of its chat channel, thirty-four group meetings and six manuscripts. In talk, a member is the subject of 40.4% of convergence reports and 9.4% of failure reports, while the molecule, often said not to want to, takes nearly a third of failures; in the written record both collapse into the agentless passive.
| Authors | Signy Okpara , Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.2sjd6g |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_2sjd6g,
author = {Signy Okpara and Casimir Beng},
title = {Who Converges?: Grammatical Agency and the Middle Voice in a Computational Chemistry Group's Talk about Self-Consistent Field Calculations},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.2sjd6g},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-who-converges-grammatical-2sjd6g/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}