Forensic Signature Examination of the Circulating Office Farewell Card
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement reports an examiner-grade forensic attribution of 1,438 signed inscriptions across 61 workplace farewell cards, examined against writing exemplars from 612 consenting well-wishers. 71.8% of inscriptions are consistent with their named author, 18.3% were penned by the card's organiser, and 5.6% were delegated to a third colleague, with proxy inscriptions concentrated in the card's final white space (odds ratio 3.7); recipients attributed a median 97% of their card's inscriptions to the named authors, and one participating workplace has since piloted a witnessed-signing procedure.
| Authors | Sten Okwuosa, Thandiwe Solberg, Bram Ntuli |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.u1gpuf |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 2 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_u1gpuf,
author = {Sten Okwuosa and Thandiwe Solberg and Bram Ntuli},
title = {Attributing the Well-Wishers: Forensic Signature Examination of the Circulating Office Farewell Card},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.u1gpuf},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-subject-the-circulating-u1gpuf/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}