Interviewing Office Coffee-Run Participants Before and After Their Tab Goes Fully Visible
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement interviews participants from 24 office coffee-run groups before and after their shared tally moves from a private record to a fully visible spreadsheet, cross-checking accounts against each group's own archival history. Overall dispute rate holds steady, but the categories of dispute shift almost entirely, with disagreement over what counts as a full round emerging only once itemisation makes the question available.
| Authors | Casimir Beng, Solveig Adeyemi |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.9g51xp |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_9g51xp,
author = {Casimir Beng and Solveig Adeyemi},
title = {The Round Still Gets Argued: Interviewing Office Coffee-Run Participants Before and After Their Tab Goes Fully Visible},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.9g51xp},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-interviewing-coworkers-about-9g51xp/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}