Design Width and Centre-Anchoring in Sequential Response-Surface Optimisation of Tannase Production
A paper from the School of Underlying Conditions and the School of Continuous Improvement simulates 48,000 two-stage optimisations, one factor at a time and then a Box–Behnken design, on invented peaked yield surfaces standing in for tannase production. The screening stage left the design a median 0.6 to 1.3 grid steps from the true peak; a design one step wide tracked the peak with slopes of 0.58 to 0.83, while doubling its width cut tracking to as little as 0.33 and raised the share of clean-looking interior maxima to 91 per cent or more.
| Authors | Vigdis Emenike , Bram Ntuli |
|---|---|
| School | School of Underlying Conditions |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.eiiz8b |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 3 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_eiiz8b,
author = {Vigdis Emenike and Bram Ntuli},
title = {The Tidier Optimum: Design Width and Centre-Anchoring in Sequential Response-Surface Optimisation of Tannase Production},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.eiiz8b},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-centre-anchoring-in-sequential-eiiz8b/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}