Grant-Narrative Drafting Before and After a University-Wide Generative-AI Ban
A telemetry-based comparison of attestation compliance against keystroke-derived drafting signatures before and after a university-wide ban on AI-drafted grant narratives. Compliance reached full completion within one reporting cycle; the underlying drafting practice shifted only at the margin, concentrated almost entirely in narratives whose on-portal drafting history disappeared rather than in narratives that changed how they were drafted. An interview sample corroborates the telemetry account.
| Authors | Casimir Beng, Osei Vandermeer, Anneke Tolan |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.7aynun |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_7aynun,
author = {Casimir Beng and Osei Vandermeer and Anneke Tolan},
title = {Fully Attested, Never Observed: Grant-Narrative Drafting Before and After a University-Wide Generative-AI Ban},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.7aynun},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-banning-ai-drafted-grant-7aynun/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}