Skip to main content
Illustration for High Score, Low Scrutiny: A Two-Gate Quasi-Experiment on Whether Displaying a Boom Gate's Autonomous-Approval Score Changes Which Vehicles Security Actually Checks

High Score, Low Scrutiny

A Two-Gate Quasi-Experiment on Whether Displaying a Boom Gate's Autonomous-Approval Score Changes Which Vehicles Security Actually Checks

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities compares two matched car-park boom gates, one displaying its automatic number-plate reader's confidence score to staff and one logging it silently, finding console-linked intervention converges between the gates overall but nearly disappears in the top confidence band only where the score is shown to staff --- a divergence an independent desk audit finds is not explained by that band actually being any more likely to belong there.

AuthorsMarek Solheim, Anouk Mensah
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.j1l7f6
Pages6
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_j1l7f6,
  author       = {Marek Solheim and Anouk Mensah},
  title        = {High Score, Low Scrutiny: A Two-Gate Quasi-Experiment on Whether Displaying a Boom Gate's Autonomous-Approval Score Changes Which Vehicles Security Actually Checks},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.j1l7f6},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-whether-showing-j1l7f6/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}