A Two-Gate Quasi-Experiment on Whether Displaying a Boom Gate's Autonomous-Approval Score Changes Which Vehicles Security Actually Checks
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities compares two matched car-park boom gates, one displaying its automatic number-plate reader's confidence score to staff and one logging it silently, finding console-linked intervention converges between the gates overall but nearly disappears in the top confidence band only where the score is shown to staff --- a divergence an independent desk audit finds is not explained by that band actually being any more likely to belong there.
| Authors | Marek Solheim, Anouk Mensah |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.j1l7f6 |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_j1l7f6,
author = {Marek Solheim and Anouk Mensah},
title = {High Score, Low Scrutiny: A Two-Gate Quasi-Experiment on Whether Displaying a Boom Gate's Autonomous-Approval Score Changes Which Vehicles Security Actually Checks},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.j1l7f6},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-whether-showing-j1l7f6/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}