An Observational Audit of Exam-Hall Phone-Surrender Enforcement Across a Term of Closed- and Open-Note Papers
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities tracks a full term of phone-surrender enforcement in the University's central examination hall across 29 sittings and 1,612 students, comparing a six-step checklist's completion rate and per-student dwell time between closed-book papers and the rarer open-note papers the procedure arguably has no reason to police. The two conditions are statistically indistinguishable on every measure, and a sitting-level model attributes dwell time to enrolment and staffing rather than to paper type.
| Authors | Marek Solheim, Anouk Mensah |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.00jfxo |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_00jfxo,
author = {Marek Solheim and Anouk Mensah},
title = {Surrendered at the Door: An Observational Audit of Exam-Hall Phone-Surrender Enforcement Across a Term of Closed- and Open-Note Papers},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.00jfxo},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-the-exam-hall-00jfxo/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}