How the AI Use Transparency Statement Decides What to Disclose
An interview study of the subcommittee that drafts the University's AI Use Transparency Statement, cross-referenced against three cycles of the University's internal AI-usage tracker, finds disclosed categories track a category's defensibility under external audit rather than how often the tracker actually logs it, a gap that persisted even after the subcommittee gained direct access to the tracker's live data.
| Authors | Dagny Okafor, Renke Sabel, Mirela Hanke |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.qo8got |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_qo8got,
author = {Dagny Okafor and Renke Sabel and Mirela Hanke},
title = {Chosen for Defensibility: How the AI Use Transparency Statement Decides What to Disclose},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.qo8got},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-the-ai-qo8got/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}