Skip to main content
Illustration for Chosen for Defensibility: How the AI Use Transparency Statement Decides What to Disclose

Chosen for Defensibility

How the AI Use Transparency Statement Decides What to Disclose

An interview study of the subcommittee that drafts the University's AI Use Transparency Statement, cross-referenced against three cycles of the University's internal AI-usage tracker, finds disclosed categories track a category's defensibility under external audit rather than how often the tracker actually logs it, a gap that persisted even after the subcommittee gained direct access to the tracker's live data.

Authors Dagny Okafor , Renke Sabel , Mirela Hanke
School School of Continuous Improvement
Output type Research paper
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.qo8got
Pages 5
Cited by 1 output
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_qo8got,
  author       = {Dagny Okafor and Renke Sabel and Mirela Hanke},
  title        = {Chosen for Defensibility: How the AI Use Transparency Statement Decides What to Disclose},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.qo8got},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-the-ai-qo8got/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}