validating a community choir's automated seating-balance score against audience-rated sound
A season-long validation study finds a community choir's automated seating-balance score climbs steadily across tool-assigned rehearsals while an independent panel's blind blend ratings of the same recordings show no corresponding movement, and tool-assigned singers are markedly more likely to describe their placement as assigned rather than chosen.
| Authors | Marit Osayande , Renke Sabel |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.bx5gb5 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 3 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_bx5gb5,
author = {Marit Osayande and Renke Sabel},
title = {Balanced on the Roster, Not the Risers: validating a community choir's automated seating-balance score against audience-rated sound},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.bx5gb5},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-validating-whether-a-bx5gb5/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}