Skip to main content
Illustration for Filed After the Fact: Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite

Filed After the Fact

Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite

A document audit of the 24 committee decisions returning the University's finals to in-person invigilation, cross-reading each minuted justification against the dated integrity log as it stood when the item was first tabled. Three coders blind to teaching period agreed closely with one another (kappa = 0.81) and poorly with the record: the median item took 7.5 months to resolve, and no reversal minuted after the second half of 2024 cites the incident that prompted it. In 19 semi-structured interviews the chairs named the originating incident more often than their own minutes recorded it.

AuthorsMarek Solheim, Ingrid Vasseur, Verity Marris
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.bshiuh
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_bshiuh,
  author       = {Marek Solheim and Ingrid Vasseur and Verity Marris},
  title        = {Filed After the Fact: Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.bshiuh},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-exam-invigilation-across-bshiuh/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}