Skip to main content
Illustration for Filed After the Fact: Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite

Filed After the Fact

Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite

A document audit of the 24 committee decisions returning the University's finals to in-person invigilation, cross-reading each minuted justification against the dated integrity log as it stood when the item was first tabled. Three coders blind to teaching period agreed closely with one another (kappa = 0.81) and poorly with the record: the median item took 7.5 months to resolve, and no reversal minuted after the second half of 2024 cites the incident that prompted it. In 19 semi-structured interviews the chairs named the originating incident more often than their own minutes recorded it.

Authors Marek Solheim , Ingrid Vasseur , Verity Marris
School School of Emergent Priorities
Output type Research poster
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.bshiuh
Pages 1
Cited by 1 output
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_bshiuh,
  author       = {Marek Solheim and Ingrid Vasseur and Verity Marris},
  title        = {Filed After the Fact: Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.bshiuh},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-exam-invigilation-across-bshiuh/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}