Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite
A document audit of the 24 committee decisions returning the University's finals to in-person invigilation, cross-reading each minuted justification against the dated integrity log as it stood when the item was first tabled. Three coders blind to teaching period agreed closely with one another (kappa = 0.81) and poorly with the record: the median item took 7.5 months to resolve, and no reversal minuted after the second half of 2024 cites the incident that prompted it. In 19 semi-structured interviews the chairs named the originating incident more often than their own minutes recorded it.
| Authors | Marek Solheim, Ingrid Vasseur, Verity Marris |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.bshiuh |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_bshiuh,
author = {Marek Solheim and Ingrid Vasseur and Verity Marris},
title = {Filed After the Fact: Reversal Rationales in Committee Minutes and the Incidents They No Longer Cite},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.bshiuh},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-exam-invigilation-across-bshiuh/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}