Does the call decide whose remark reaches the minutes?
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement follows 1,486 remarks begun while muted across 57 community-committee video meetings, sorting each by how quickly someone called "you're on mute" and by whether it reached the circulated minutes. Remarks alerted within six seconds were minuted at 29%, against 64% for later alerts, with coded subject matter accounting for little of the gap. On that finding the University binds its committees to a Six-Second Hold on the call, and to minuting every muted remark as lip-read from the gallery view, with no discretion in the chair to omit it.
| Authors | Sten Okwuosa , Osei Vandermeer , Dagny Okafor |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.j1gtrv |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_j1gtrv,
author = {Sten Okwuosa and Osei Vandermeer and Dagny Okafor},
title = {“You’re on Mute” as a Point of Order: Does the call decide whose remark reaches the minutes?},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.j1gtrv},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-does-a-you-re-j1gtrv/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}