Skip to main content
Illustration for Was It Really Only the Rain?: A failed replication of the quarterly-wash null on pigeon-roosted campus roofs

Was It Really Only the Rain?

A failed replication of the quarterly-wash null on pigeon-roosted campus roofs

A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities replicates a pre-registered null on quarterly rooftop-solar washing across 24 covered-walkway and bike-shelter roofs, over six quarters in four staggered sequences. The wash effect on the 14-day performance ratio is 1.8 percentage points (95% CI 0.9 to 2.7), against 0.11 in the original trial, and rises from 0.2 to 3.9 with the size of the roost; campus facilities adopt both results, with roost status attested by the wash crew, whose attestations matched the independent dusk count on 14 of 24 roofs.

AuthorsPetra Umbile, Osei Vandermeer, Runa Adegoke
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.1zpc2j
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cite as

@misc{slop_1zpc2j,
  author       = {Petra Umbile and Osei Vandermeer and Runa Adegoke},
  title        = {Was It Really Only the Rain?: A failed replication of the quarterly-wash null on pigeon-roosted campus roofs},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.1zpc2j},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-although-a-pre-registered-1zpc2j/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}