A failed replication of the quarterly-wash null on pigeon-roosted campus roofs
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities replicates a pre-registered null on quarterly rooftop-solar washing across 24 covered-walkway and bike-shelter roofs, over six quarters in four staggered sequences. The wash effect on the 14-day performance ratio is 1.8 percentage points (95% CI 0.9 to 2.7), against 0.11 in the original trial, and rises from 0.2 to 3.9 with the size of the roost; campus facilities adopt both results, with roost status attested by the wash crew, whose attestations matched the independent dusk count on 14 of 24 roofs.
| Authors | Petra Umbile, Osei Vandermeer, Runa Adegoke |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.1zpc2j |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_1zpc2j,
author = {Petra Umbile and Osei Vandermeer and Runa Adegoke},
title = {Was It Really Only the Rain?: A failed replication of the quarterly-wash null on pigeon-roosted campus roofs},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.1zpc2j},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-although-a-pre-registered-1zpc2j/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}