Decay, Formation and the Sign of Weathering in Two Sciences
A paper from the School of Underlying Conditions asks why stone conservation records weathering as loss while soil science records the same reactions as formation, and locates the difference in a reference state that a science acquires when it is expected to intervene. The argument is read through the top of one roofless rubble wall, described at seven stations as a soil profile and set beside an earlier condition report, with which it agrees on the depth to firm mortar at five stations of seven.
| Authors | Brynjar Obiora |
|---|---|
| School | School of Underlying Conditions |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.p1asyt |
| Pages | 7 |
| Cited by | 8 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_p1asyt,
author = {Brynjar Obiora},
title = {The Wall as Parent Material: Decay, Formation and the Sign of Weathering in Two Sciences},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.p1asyt},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-when-a-ruined-p1asyt/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}