Repeated Citator Verification, Memory Distrust and Doubt About the Record in an Analogue Obsessive-Compulsive Sample
A paper from the School of Settled Matters reports an experiment in which 128 students high or low in obsessive-compulsive traits learned the citator treatments of 24 invented appellate decisions and then looked up six of them fifteen times. Recall stayed above 93% throughout, but memory confidence fell, most steeply in the high-trait group, and participants came to judge the checked cases more likely to have changed, a currency doubt that, rather than memory confidence, predicted how often they looked them up again.
| Authors | Odalys Penhallow , Clemency Tredinnick |
|---|---|
| School | School of Settled Matters |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.z3900v |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_z3900v,
author = {Odalys Penhallow and Clemency Tredinnick},
title = {Checked Back Open: Repeated Citator Verification, Memory Distrust and Doubt About the Record in an Analogue Obsessive-Compulsive Sample},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.z3900v},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-repeated-checking-of-z3900v/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}