An Interview Study of Locker Retention Under an Automated Inactivity-Reclamation Sweep
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities interviews 46 storage-locker holders the University's Locker Retention Sweep credits as engaged, despite a research-only door sensor showing their lockers are rarely opened at all. Coded to saturation, the accounts sort into four kinds of keep-alive tap, distributed differently at the Recreation Centre and the Library, and a term-long pilot doubling the qualifying-tap threshold left genuine use statistically unchanged.
| Authors | Lindiwe Achterberg, Anneke Tolan |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.m2pufb |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_m2pufb,
author = {Lindiwe Achterberg and Anneke Tolan},
title = {The Keep-Alive Tap: An Interview Study of Locker Retention Under an Automated Inactivity-Reclamation Sweep},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.m2pufb},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-interviewing-gym-locker-m2pufb/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}