A Typology of Primary-School Council Pledges and What Wins the Vote
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities codes 587 primary-school student-council campaign posters into procedural, aspirational, and undeliverable pledge types and matches each against its candidate's recorded vote share. Undeliverable pledges win at roughly double the rate of procedural ones, a gap that a school-level feasibility review narrows in composition but leaves unchanged at the ballot box.
| Authors | Ronja Oyelaran, Iben Chikere |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.p3oadh |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_p3oadh,
author = {Ronja Oyelaran and Iben Chikere},
title = {Impossible to Deliver, Easy to Elect: A Typology of Primary-School Council Pledges and What Wins the Vote},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.p3oadh},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-classifying-the-pledges-p3oadh/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}