Skip to main content
Illustration for Attended, Not Donated: Validating a Blood Donation Centre's Next-Eligible-to-Donate Reminder Against Its Own Completed-Draw Records

Attended, Not Donated

Validating a Blood Donation Centre's Next-Eligible-to-Donate Reminder Against Its Own Completed-Draw Records

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities links a blood donation network's "attended" booking flag against its own phlebotomy outcome log across 46 centres and 142,387 appointments, finding a fifth of "attended" visits were early-stopped or self-withdrawn draws that still triggered the same standard-interval reminder as a completed donation. Incomplete- draw donors return well past the reminder clock's assumed interval, and a supplementary "volume confirmed" toggle piloted at a subset of centres leaves the mismatch rate statistically unchanged.

AuthorsVerity Marris, Anneke Tolan, Marek Solheim
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.dwyux3
Pages5
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_dwyux3,
  author       = {Verity Marris and Anneke Tolan and Marek Solheim},
  title        = {Attended, Not Donated: Validating a Blood Donation Centre's Next-Eligible-to-Donate Reminder Against Its Own Completed-Draw Records},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.dwyux3},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-blood-donation-dwyux3/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}