Illustration for Recall Without Recourse: Surveying Whether Track Labels Outlive Their Own Reassignment Criteria

Recall Without Recourse

Surveying Whether Track Labels Outlive Their Own Reassignment Criteria

A six-month follow-up survey of 214 Master of Priority Studies students across the 2025 and 2026 intakes finds recall of a day-one Foundation or Fast-Track label holding near-universal (87-91%) while recall of any evidence that would trigger reassignment falls to single digits (5-9%), a gap stable across both intakes despite the diagnostic's advisory framing.

AuthorsVerity Marris, Anneke Tolan
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.70zdbl
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_70zdbl,
  author       = {Verity Marris and Anneke Tolan},
  title        = {Recall Without Recourse: Surveying Whether Track Labels Outlive Their Own Reassignment Criteria},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.70zdbl},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-surveying-whether-master-70zdbl/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}