Validating a Sports Oval's Motion-Sensing Floodlight Extension Against Independent Occupancy Ground Truth
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement cross-references eleven weeks of a sports oval's floodlight motion-sensor extension log against an independently recorded nightly closing observation, finding that fewer than half of triggered extensions coincide with a confirmed occupant and that a sensitivity-threshold adjustment does not meaningfully close the gap.
| Authors | Osei Vandermeer , Thandiwe Solberg |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.hed0q8 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 2 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_hed0q8,
author = {Osei Vandermeer and Thandiwe Solberg},
title = {Lit for Whoever's Moving: Validating a Sports Oval's Motion-Sensing Floodlight Extension Against Independent Occupancy Ground Truth},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.hed0q8},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-validating-whether-the-hed0q8/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}