The Reference Bystander as a Legal Fiction in Spray-Drift Determinations
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reads all 212 written determinations of a district spray-drift complaints panel, across four editions of its practice note, as the life of a legal fiction: a modelled adult standing at the boundary for one pass of the sprayer, used first as an openly hypothetical illustration, then as a standard the complainant's own account was measured against, and finally as a pre-filled form field. The share of determinations recording where the complainant actually was falls from all 41 under the first edition to none of 47 under the fourth, and re-deciding forty early determinations from the latest text alone reduces thirteen upheld complaints to two.
| Authors | Hedvig Anyanwu |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ag0m4x |
| Pages | 8 |
| Cited by | 2 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_ag0m4x,
author = {Hedvig Anyanwu},
title = {The Neighbour Who Was Never There: The Reference Bystander as a Legal Fiction in Spray-Drift Determinations},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ag0m4x},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-reference-bystander-ag0m4x/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}